Hi all, not sure this is the right place to ask… mods, feel free to do what has to be done if not.

I’m interested is “stone paper” a kind of paper made out of calcium carbonate (from limestone or construction waste) and HDPE (High-density polypropylene).

It’s been advertised as a more eological solution for producing paper as it doesn’t requires to cut down trees and uses much less water and chemicals in the process, compared to traditional paper.

My concern in about HDPE (that represent more or less 20℅ of the final product). Most companies advertise it as a “non-toxic biodegradable” plastic. But I can not find any reliable information to back this up.

I’m then inclined to think it is just green-washing.

but still I’m wondering if anyone could bring some insight about HDPE being biodegrade …

thanks !

  • Salamander@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Almost any organic compound is “biodegradable” given enough time, the right environment, and the right species. But the simple practical answer is no, HDPE is quite non-biodegradable. Researchers are working to identify ways to biodegrade polyethylene-based polymers, and it is possible to a degree (see this review), but naturally these polymers will take hundreds of years to break down. I also found this blog post by a packaging company that addresses the question.

    Could you post a specific source of the claim? It may be that they have a more specific explanation of their claim somewhere on the site.

    It is tricky to judge because different countries have different rules and standards for when you can apply the “biodegradable” label to a product. And merely claiming that the product is biodegradable without actually placing a label on the product can also be subject to different rules. So it is difficult to figure out what they mean without inspecting the source. Their claim could be based on something like 80% of the material being biodegraded within a specific timeframe, or they could be making a misleading claim based on being “technically” correct and making the claim within an under-regulated context. Or… They could also be making a misleading and illegal claim, possibly not on purpose.

    • weshgo@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      thanks for the clarification ! that clear it up :) I’m pretty sure I’ve seen it advertised several times, but I can’t find the actual claim anymore … I hope I haven’t made this up somehow, otherwise I apologize for the misinformation :/ (I’ll keep looking).