• Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    if someone pointing out that you are saying “fact” but aren’t meeting any of the definitions of a fact seems like an attack to you i suspect you’re probably having a bad time on the internet. Again you dodge most of the actual points of the conversation, probably intentionally.

    Also i’m pretty sure “Fucking lmfao.” has a redundant “Fucking” in it , but I’m not holding my breath on you caring about that given how this has gone so far.

    Doesn’t seem like this is going to go anywhere interesting, so I’ll just add you to the blocklist and be happy nothing of value(to me) was lost.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Actually you pointed out that you missed the point of my comment since you assumed it was about the US freedom of speech, when they aren’t even the original. I even provided a link to an article, and you had to search so far down for a small blurb on the USA, while ignoring the wall of text that says it’s not a USA thing, nor even started there………………

      So yes ignoring my facts while pushing your own wildly incorrect ones is in fact an attack on someone’s character.

      I’m using two fuckings to show just how asinine your argument is, fucking lmfao. It’s called redundancy, I’m making sure my point got across since you intentionally ignored my first one and inputted your own massively I incorrect one.

      You’re nothing but a troll trying to derail a conversation, so maybe look in a mirror before calling others out, fucking lmfao.