• TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 年前

    Nobody is disputing that.

    The value of the tree ironically does go up a lot over time. But it’s still the value of the tree. The value of everything else is still a cost and that is EXACTLY THE POINT I MADE. The cost of the tree is insignificant compared to the house and you’re hotel bills.

    Reading comprehension… It’s a glorious thing, and lost on Americans.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      My fellow lemming. You made a terse comment that was prone to misinterpretation. People misinterpreted it.

      I see what you’re trying to say, and I see how people are understanding it differently than you may have intended.

      I’m not saying your underlying message was wrong, certainly a rusted old bridge is momentarily not worth the same money that it was when it was installed, but that’s not how you seem to have been interpreted.

      I won’t tell you what to do, but if I may make a suggestion: it may be prudent to be a little less terse.

      Have a good day.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      The point you made?

      Someone said replacing the bridge would cost billions and you called them out saying that it’s rusty and decaying.

      And the value of trees is a complicated subject. A significant part of my life is dealing with trees and the laws surrounding them for a municipal government.