• pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, the prose is certainly better. Rowling is unimaginative and repetitive in her use of language. The number of times she reuses phrases (like, “Ron’s untidy scrawl,”) is criminal. She’s a lot like Agatha Christie; great concepts, mundane execution.

    • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Really not a high bar, tbh. Just don’t promote slavery along with maintaining the exact status quo that lead to wizard hitler, and you’re miles ahead.

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      HP has the better film franchise though. ASOUE just had the Carrey film, which was alright but did not follow the books and left a LOT of mystery from the books off

      the show was really good…until season 3. my favorite character being reduced to a single laugh and a painting was the nail in the coffin, and the finale was just bad

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Learnt nothing, in french you would say “Sacre Bleu”, lit. “Blue [the act of consecrating]”.

      Blue was the colour of Saint Martin, so instead of swearing on god, you would swear on the canonisation of st. Martin, in a manner removed from the actual thing. Only English speakers use “sacré bleu” as a vaguely-french sounding thing.

      Saying sacré [person] makes sense somewhat, but you would use it like “there’s my boy, way to go!”, not as a “holy shit” exclamation.