• techt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    He’s saying lay off to 150k, not by 150k. He says getting down to that would be a 20% reduction, so that puts the then-current headcount at ~188k, so get rid of about 35-40k people.

      • techt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        35k is a pretty huge amount better than 150k. Are you just trying to say that it sucks either way? Because that I agree with, but when we criticize things, we should at least have the numbers right.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, I’m saying he’s a psychopath regardless of the numerical error. He’s talking about destroying the livelihood of tens of thousands of people, just so he can make some more money he doesn’t need, and could never spend. So it doesn’t really matter if it’s 30k, 40k, or 150k. He would propose anything that benefits him personally, regardless of the suffering it causes.

          • Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you work at Google you’ll probably bounce back just fine.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Kinda glad I work in government/heavy industry. The highs aren’t very high and the lows aren’t very low. I will never be rich but I also will never be unemployed for over a week by choice.

                • Miaou@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  And those sectors would gladly hire people from the tech sector, but yeah no one will pay you 300k for writing JavaScript

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Maybe. If I was hiring someone new under me I would tend to avoid people who worked for Alphabet. Frankly controls+automation is a not a fun field to be in. If you want to get into it you have to be willing to endure it. Can’t exactly have someone who spent their childhood riding horses on their private estate working in a slaughter house.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You don’t think firing 150,000 people is better or worse than firing 40,000? Ok.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m saying his complete disregard for these employees as people, with families, and lives, is unaffected by the difference. He’s proposing to fire 30,000+ people so that a number in his portfolio can grow. A number that he doesn’t need, and will never spend. He’s a fucking psychopath, regardless of it being 30k, 40k, or 150k.