• evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah, I think overall, skill is going up, but I literally don’t know any millennial (or younger) couples where both people do not work. I can make a hell of a good meal out of anything, as can almost all of my peers, but the mental load and time required to effectively plan and execute a range of meals throughout the week is just too high for most people who work. Most traditional poor food is just stuff that takes time and/or labor to cook. Braises and barbecues, porridges like grits or oats, soups and stews.

    I might grab some of whatever I see on sale at the grocery store, but I’m not planning anything ahead of time unless there’s a special occasion meal.

    To take advantage of a ham going on sale, you need to plan one meal of ham + sides, and the ham likely takes a few hours to warm up. Another meal after could be baked beans with ham (which require overnight soaking) to be planned ahead, and several hours of baking. Another meal might be pea soup with the ham bone, another meal that takes a while to prepare. Most people just don’t have the time for that. When I want to make baked beans, I end up just buying a small chunk of country ham at a greater markup.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      If your problem for meal planning is the lack of imagination, ChatGPT is surprisingly good at coming with easy to cook diverse meals. I’m not even kidding. LLMs are great at regurgitating info they read somewhere meshed together, and that’s what planning is.

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah, that’s insane. Both my wife and I work 40 hours a week and raise a toddler.

      If you are doing 60 hours weeks sure that’s valid but at the risk of being called boomer that’s some bullshit. It takes 2 hours tops to shop every week and a half hour to make a decent meal. You have plenty of time to do that on a 40 hour week.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I do most of the week’s cooking ahead of time on the weekend, giving me even more time to relax if I’ve had a long day.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wouldn’t even say 2 hours of shopping time, but yeah. I hate shopping, so I run in and out, 30 minutes tops. I commented here, but I think the problem is people don’t know how to cook. They find a recipe online, hunt all over the store for the ingredients, go home, cook it up, look at the time spent. Now they have leftover ingredients and think those are a waste.

        If you already know a few dozen things you like, you already know where to find those ingredients in the store. And whatever your tastes, there’s bound to be crossover. I love me some Mexican. With the same few ingredients, I can make loads of different dishes.

        Learning takes time up front, just like any skill. And yeah, you’ll spend money ramping up the pantry and fridge, and you’ll waste money starting out. Figuring out how to feed yourself is part of growing up.

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m being generous for the sake of argument. I can fill an entire us grocery cart and be out the door inside of 45 minutes.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, definitely still possible, but my point is that wages no longer support having one person that can devote their whole day to cooking/cleaning/etc. No matter how good you are at cooking dinner in 30 minutes, you would be able to make better and cheaper meals given 8 hours.

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I honestly don’t think that really true though. Frozen and fresh produce + protein, beans, rice is about as cheap as you get. Maaaaybe you save a few bucks buying in bulk at Costco but that’s an extreme for limited gains. And adding time to food prep doesn’t necessarily make it better. You can eat very very well in the US on 5 hours and $100 a week.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Buying in bulk can actually realize significant savings. It’s definitely true that more active time does not directly translate to more savings, especially with just a little planning. Lots of food is happy to cook itself while you wait.