• blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dude whatever you heard is wrong. She directly copied stuff.

    She was so blatant or lazy she copied the acknowledgement sections.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you have a source on that? Not saying you’re wrong, but so far the only sources I find are backing up what the other person said.

    • acoustics_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I challenge the idea that it is even possible to plagiarise an Acknowledgements section. It’s not a substantive section of the work and has no bearing on the work itself. In addition, boilerplate is not only extremely common for Acknowledgements, for a paper it’s essentially required. All of the acknowledgement sections of my papers are basically identical, and are basically identical to all of my colleagues on the same funding, because that’s how it works. Did we plagiarise each other or our supervisor by saying “This study was supported by ERC Horizon 2030 grant no. Xxxxxx, The Extremely Solid Study (TESS)”?

      Without that article actually showing what was supposedly plagiarised in her acknowledgements, I don’t buy it.