It’s lemmygrad, we’re the spectre. I’d bet at least half of the other instances out there block us, there’s only like 300 dedicated users on this instance, and they still can’t stop complaining about lemmygrad/tankies

  • commiespammer@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m confused. Do you expect China to be instantly fully communist without money or class? Do you know that China started as a poor and feudal country and has constantly been under pressure and sanctions from the west?

    It’s like giving you control of an island full of people with almost no food and enemies thirsting to attack at any moment. Go on, build communism.

    • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I’m saying China is a capitalist oligarchy. Currently, right now. I don’t believe it can ever become communism with the current people still in power. That can be debatable, but what they are right now is definitely not communism, and that’s all I was saying

      • commiespammer@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, it’s not communism right now. But Xi Jinping is not a ‘capitalist oligarch’. And China has pulled millions out of poverty, build an advanced public transport system, given massive amounts of aid to third-world countries while helping them develop, and has cracked down on corruption. If this is a ‘capitalist oligarchy’ then I will gladly support it.

        • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, I would also call the US a capitalist oligarchy, wouldn’t call Biden an oligarch, and would say they’ve done the same in the past, so yeah I would still call it that personally. That’s generally how industrialisation under capitalism goes. I’d even go as far as to say the US and UK had a lot of influence on it getting where it is in the first place, and it’s very difficult to do trade with the west in this world without shifting towards capitalism. (Not impossible, but difficult)

          Edit: In the definition of oligarchy, a small group of people hold power. I take that as relatively small, so maybe I’m mis using the term. Aristocracy might be a better term, but it’s somewhere in the middle

          • commiespammer@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The US has not eliminated poverty. Where did you get that from? In addition, the US has done nothing to help 3rd world countries at all, only to exploit them for resources. Before you say that’s what China is doing too, it’s not.

            • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I did not say the US eliminated poverty and you didn’t say China has eliminated poverty?

              The US has indeed exploited countries for resources, but that does mean they haven’t also helped in some cases, even if it’s a minority of cases

              • commiespammer@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                China has eliminated poverty. And China helped in every case, while the US exploited in every case. I don’t see how those two are similar.

                  • commiespammer@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    How is that “splitting hairs”? If I go to your house and help you build it, is that really the same as blasting it down with explosives?