• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    33% is a massive amount for effectively just being a download service. massive

    • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      For reference, the Steam store of the gaming distributor Valve charges 30% of each sale, however the Steam service provides quite a bit of incentive. Having community and discussions easily accessible, cloud storage that links to screenshots and saves, branches, I’m sure there’s more.

      Meanwhile Spotify gives you, what, playlist creations?

      • Rendh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because servers and traffic are free. Totally forgot how you don’t have to pay the people keeping the service alive either. A steam game you download once? Maybe once a year? Music gets streamed (downloaded) every single time unless you decide to download it. Can we maybe not pretend like Spotify does fucking nothing?

        • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I didn’t mention servers because that is their only cost next to employees.

          If they aren’t paying artists well, well what’s the point of having servers.

          Maybe can we not pretend like Spotify is some up and coming startup that barely breaks even because of their benevolence?