• Aatube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Have you ever looked into the operating costs of having a server with music on it which over 400M monthly active users use?

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I actually work in cloud engineering and regularly price this kind of thing up.

      Their costs are salaries not aws bills.

    • chameleon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not that high. Spotify uses some pretty tight compression (not good, just tight); most users get 96-128kbit/s AAC, premium can go a bit higher if opted in. That works out to about 16KB/s or 58MB/hour, assuming nothing’s cached.

      Bandwidth pricing very much goes down with scale, not up. But even the non-committed AWS pricing at Spotify’s scale is 2 to 3 cents/GB. You end up paying way less than that with any kind of commitment and AWS isn’t the cheapest around to begin with.