• maryjayjay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    As a software engineer I’m interested in the value that would add over simply having combinations of the tags as is possible now

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the question boils down to something like “For this data set, is there information captured by a tree representation that’s not captured by a list of categories?” Trees, or graphs in general, can capture path-based relationships. Categories are based of course on set theory.

      I think both have their place, and like anything within mathematics or programming it comes down to which metaphor more naturally and easily expresses what you’re trying to do. I find trees and graphs easy to think about and represent visually, but it all depends on the problem space and the approach.

      Note: This is assuming the kind of “tree” we implement permits multiple inheritance if needed.

    • prashanthvsdvn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      These kind of tags are supported in all kinds of note taking apps. I don’t think it would be an Hercularian task to achieve it.

      • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re right, it’s almost trivial.

        But as someone who designs software I don’t immediately see any additional functionality. I’d like to understand the benefit to see if I want to incorporate the feature sometime