• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The fact that FlyingSquid declared Meta to be “0% open source” when in fact Meta has been a major contributor to open source suggests that they’re simply saying whatever bad things they can think of saying about Meta, not bothering to ground those things in any real facts. That’s presumably because right now everyone is dumping on Meta and so comments that say bad things about Meta get upvoted without being checked (and comments that says anything as tepid as “maybe Meta is not completely awful” garners downvotes and homophobic attacks, ask me how I know). That’s the hate train I’m talking about.

    The motivation of why Meta does what it does doesn’t change what they’re doing. It’s entirely possible for a big giant evil corporation to see benefit in playing nice with an open source ecosystem. My position all along has been to wait and see what they’re going to do before instantly leaping to fragment the Fediverse against them.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Their motivation is more important than what they’re doing. But right now their motivation is to compete with Twitter. The Fediverse is no threat to them because it’s tiny.