• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Licensing isn’t about magically ensuring that the practitioner won’t make mistakes; it’s about holding the practitioner accountable for his mistakes, which in theory gives him more incentive to be more careful – or to change his practice’s workflows and systems so as to be better able to detect and correct mistakes.

    In fact, I would argue that the “throwing more people at the problem” phenomenon in healthcare is an example of that very thing. Do you think they’d keep staffing levels equally high without licensing? 'Cause I sure don’t.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, what you say is let’s hold the lowest level accountable, the person who may don’t have any power over the fcked up decisions about the amount of developers, presence of QA, and timeline.

      No, licensing will not make “accountable” people magically incentivised enough to make no mistakes

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A licensed Professional Engineer is exactly the opposite of the lowest level person. In fact, that’s part of the point: giving the experts the power to say “no” to unsafe/unethical management.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, stated that way it makes more sense, thanks for the explanation

          Don’t think that kind of thing is going to happen, though