• RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are some services I pay for using a subscription service. My password manager, because my whole family uses it. Various streaming services, mostly because they have stopped providing physical media and have now created a monopoly on their content. But that’s it. I used to pay for PathFinder, a Mac Finder replacement. I would happily upgrade my license on every major release because it was a perpetual license. When they switched to a subscription model, I just stopped.

    What I think these companies don’t understand is that keeping track of a bunch of subscriptions results in a huge cognitive load. Not only do I have to keep track of which prices are fair relative to many other similar services, I have to keep track of when they renew so I’m not taken by surprise. In most cases, not having to deal with that cognitive load is a better deal for me than the service they’re offering.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea I’m not against any and all subscriptions in principle. When I was taxi driving, having unlimited music on Spotify was totally worth it and a great upgrade over radio. I even had Audible for a while, where you get one book a month to keep (DRM aside, which can be dealt with), so you know exactly what you’re getting.

      The major problem is how much everyone is pushing subs now for every stupid thing, how markers are fracturing and worst of all, with most services once you subscribe, you take a massive hit and lose everything you’ve paid for until then - such as with the game passes. So one can only keep sucking up the ever increasing prices, further fragmentation and be at the provider’s mercy whether the thing even keeps going at all.