• DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ah, the good old “systemic oppression doesn’t exist because free will”

    Next you’re gonna say women who are forced by the state to carry pregnancies to term can just choose not to raise their kids

        • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re saying it’s immoral to give up a child for adoption when you are unable to raise it, but it’s not immoral to abort it before it even has a chance to take its first breath?

          • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re very confused. We’re talking about women who COULD raise a child while working a job, and would rather have a life of their own, but are bound by basic morality. You also seem to think a single celled organism with no nervous system is a child.

            • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, I am indeed confused. Are you saying that women who COULD raise a child but choose not to are acting immorally when they give their child up for adoption, but they are acting morally if they chose to abort their pregnancy instead?

              Because it sounds like that’s what you are saying.