What defederating would mean:

  • We won’t see beehaw.org posts/comments on other instances.

Pros:

  • There is less confusion, you can’t respond to a beehaw.org user, thinking they will be able to see your response when in reality they cannot.

Cons:

  • We won’t be able to see any beehaw.org comments/posts on other instances, so we will miss out on some comment threads and posts. It could be good to be able to see them and interact with the other users there even though beehaw.org users won’t see any of our content.

Summary

Overall, I think it is better not to defederate, but simply unsubscribe from all of their communities (and as we no longer get posts from their instance, with time these will cease to appear on our ‘front page’).

beehaw.org users already can’t see our posts/comments anywhere so it’s not like defederating would change their experience in any way, so it wouldn’t really be retaliation and would just limit the content available to lemmy.world users.

What do you think?

  • Aurix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please don’t defederate. Just have it reserved for actually intentionally malicious or negligent instances.

  • Odin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly I think this is an interesting real-world experiment in the entire federation paradigm. It’s going to happen again and again, there’s no escaping it. How does the ecosystem work when two large instances can’t communicate directly? We’re going to find out.

    • JohannesOliver@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was an issue in Mastodon originally too, but Mastodon added more flexibility to the platform and the nuke option wasn’t the only option.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lets avoid defederating. I am not to sure why beehaw.org defederated Lemmy.world, i understand it’s not a final decision but more of a quick mitigation to deal with de difficulty related to the reddit exodus. Right?

    • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we need to avoid defederating as well, should only be used for the most problematic, habitual cases of malicious intent imo.

      We need to let this grow and solidify a bit more before we start to really get in the weeds as far as our identity as a community.

    • FantasticFox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But surely we hope that this level of users is permanent? I think it’ll be in place until lemmy has better moderation tools, which could be quite some time. It has the benefit that it is Open Source though so anyone can help.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem is mainly that open registration allows quick ban evasion, making it very hard to remove bad actors that are using instances with open registration (without admin approval).

        • FantasticFox@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But admin approval just slows it down right? Like how is the admin going to know you aren’t a bad actor?

          It also really slows down the sign-up process which will cripple the growth of the Fediverse.

  • flimsyberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My gut feeling is that defederation should be done as little as possible. I’m quite new to all this, but to me, it feels like it should be user preference instead of admin/mod preference. I have no clue whether that is even possible though. Perhaps there should be more filters than just Subscribed, Local and All to alleviate certain issues.

  • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What happened? Why are they making this move? I think it’s a bad idea to start defederating, especially this early.

    Edit: How effective or practical, for lemmy.world in the future, would a voting system be for defederating? In case it comes to that for us.

    Cause it seems like a very dramatic approach, with only a few people making the decision to drop a ton of content yknow.

    Not sure if it’s possible even, I know it comes down to our admin, but they seem pretty cool. I dunno just thinking aloud.

    • FantasticFox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They said they couldn’t deal with the level of abuse and spam that came from lemmy.world users. They have a much more restrictive content policy and smaller, centralised moderation team than most other instances which exacerbated the problem.

      • ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s dumb is that if someone wanted to troll them they could just make an account on any number of smaller instances that they federate with. I mean, eventually they will have to be completely siloed off to prevent outside trolling.

      • nude@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were struggling with moderation, and a disproportionate number of people they were addressing were coming from those two instances, which happen to have open registration.

        Not sure I agree or not, but thats what they said

    • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now im sitting here wondering if I offended anyone over there lol. It’s hard to imagine, but since I’ve seen no bad actors myself, I’m starting to think that it’s possible I did, unknowingly, with zero intent to do so, and they just have a really strict thing going on. I doubt it’s the case, or I hope not at least.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doubtful you offended anyone. I think beehaw was seeing serious things like child porn and anti-LGBT posts, and traced them back to lemmy.world or the other one.

      • Wolfric1982@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it wasn’t you. There were a couple of accounts that went in and spammed a whole bunch of bigoted posts.

      • curiosityLynx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It isn’t the case.

        The first problem was actual trolls using were using lemmy.world’s open and automated registration (beehaw makes you write why you want to join and manually approves registrations based on that) to troll Beehaw.

        The second problem was that the moderation tools aren’t mature enough yet to deal with problem one with anything between manually banning every troll (which will immediately come back by creating another lemmy.world account) and total defederation from the instances most of those trolls are coming from.

        Because Beehaw’s mission statement is to be a safe space, it was decided to go with the defederation option.

        However, the defederation isn’t planned to be permanent. Improvements in mod tools and/or maturing of communities are said to be reasons to refederate again.

        Edit: spelling

  • albinanigans@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or… here’s a wild idea… let instances do what they want?

    If an instance wants to act the fool or allow trolls to overrun their space, then another instance can choose to not want anything to do with it.

      • albinanigans@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, I agree with you BTW. That’s kinda how the Fediverse works. I don’t need access to everything and everything doesn’t need access to me-- and that’s true for everybody.

        That’s why I stuck around, I guess. If I really want to access an instance that badly, there’s always RSS.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main thing is that beehaw has an application process for creating a new account, while most lemmy instances do not. They defederated because they were struggling to keep troublesome people out since banned users could just create a new account on another instance and get back in.

      Their moderation/admin policy is very strict, and they only have a few admins to manage it.

    • yopla@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Beehaw mods want more curation of users and content on their instance and they think the mod tools available to them are not sufficient to handle users coming from other instances so they decided to defederate a couple of instances, from which, they say, too many trolls are coming due to their open registration policy.

  • RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Go ahead and defederate them, they’re the ones that want to be closed off in their little centralised liberal safe zone.

    • cloaker@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think not wanting fascists and trolls galore makes it a liberal safe zone, they just don’t want the truly wild west. There’s a lot of people out here now which weren’t just a month ago.

    • Deref@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s their decision and you should respect that. I also don’t agree with the defederation and the rest of their policies but you can just not use it. No need to turn this into a political conflict.

        • bibeoboy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is nothing political about people not wanting to waste unnecessary time moderating social media.

            • bibeoboy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Safe spaces and freedom of trolls/bigots is not political. No where in the beehaw explanation do they cite politics as a reason for this. If someone kept calling me a idiot commie and I blocked them, I’m not blocking politics I’m blocking trolling.

              • goat@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except their excuses are pretty poor. Modlogs are always public info, and you can see that there were only one or two trolls. That doesn’t warrant blocking hundreds of other users.

                • bibeoboy@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So then you agree? It’s not political?

                  Whether it was the right decision or not, they said they made it because trolls were coming from those communities and those communities have open sign ups. They also said it’s not permanent so it’s not like they’re trying to silence a group of people perceived to mostly be on those servers. Just a group of mods/admins that took maybe too severe of a step to protect their base/their time/their own mental health.