Han (The Preble) shot first.

    • Geobloke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering that they’re gonna give infantry shotguns to shoot down drones , I like where this universe is going

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    3 days ago

    Who would win?

    New Navy with line of sight laser weapon (3 mile range to horizon), or this smokey boy throwing 2,000 lbs of steel over the horizon.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      That picture is the closest representation of what hellfire must be without entering nuclear territory. For sheer display of power, that is that, in my opinion.

        • sprittytinkles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          There’s very minimal lateral movement. Almost all of the recoil goes downward. It would be very bad if the recoil moved the ship laterally, because then you lose your fire control solution.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s only minimaly due to sideways movement. Much more important is that the shockwaves are pushing water down creating a terracing effect.

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Quick, someone remind me which ship it was that was starting to sink so they just shoveled water to one side do they could extend the range of their weapons and effectively become an extra artillery team during WWII (was that the siege of Normandy?)

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          “Burn to oblivion. I have places to be.”

          Probably the ship, if it was sentient.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you don’t need accuracy, the Age of Sail beats this easily. This boy has 12 cannons, the Santísima Trinidad had 140.

        A broadside must have been spectacular.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          All of Trinidad’s throw weight is less than a single 16".

          Trinidad Total throw. 1510lbs.

          Missouri single barrel single shot weight. HE 1900lbs AP 2700lbs.

          Total throw weight. HE 17,100lbs AP 24,300lbs and that’s ignoring all secondaries and AA and later added missiles. Missouri could throw the total weight all of Trinidads cannons themselves in a single broadside. Oh and that’s throwing it 24mi…

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            I get it, though your calculations are a bit off, the Trinidad’s total throw comes off as a bit more, around 1150 kg, not 684 kg as you suggested.

            That said, I was going by spectacular explosions, or amount of boom. If it’s about how much shit you can throw at an enemy, the recently sunk Moskva could launch 76000 kg of explosives and steel at you in a single volley (if operated by someone not as completely inept as the Russian Navy). In fact, rocket artillery is so OP from this perspective that a single old Katyusha could throw more than 500 kg at you, so the Missouri is worth around 1.2 shitty technical trucks with MLRS batteries strapped to them per cannon.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          All of the Trinidad’s iron cannon balls would bounce off the 12" steel armor of the Iowa battleship.

    • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      The laser is for drones or missiles. Missiles are used for ships, which outrange battleships by a large margin, hence why they’ve been phased out of service. One jet can sink a ship hundreds of miles from its carrier.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It has been suggested before that we might one day see a return of the battleships. The one technology that might allow it is truly effective rail gun technology. I remember seeing a story years ago speculating that such a ship parked of the coast of North Korea might be able to lodge shells anywhere onto the Korean Peninsula from well offshore.

        Missiles are always likely to have their advantages, including range and maneuverability. But the potential advantage of railguns is a very cheap cost per shot. And instead of a ship’s hold full of explosive-stuffed missiles, your ship has a reactor, a bank of capacitors, and a whole bunch of shells that are little more than big slugs of inert metal.

        This article for example suggests a potential railgun range of 200 km.

        Us truly mastering railguns is one of the few scenarios that we might actually see a return of the old battleships. Except instead of artillery shells, they’ll be lobbing railgun slugs. And instead of being protected by foot-thick steel armor, they’ll be protected by a porcupine lattice of laser defense systems.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          How would a battleship defend itself against railguns?
          Or would this be a “whoever shoots first wins” scenario?

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Oblique angles on all possible bulkheads, and probably the biggest fuck-you electromagnet the military can strap onto a ship.

            The way I understand it, a railgun slug by definition of the way a railgun works is required to be made of ferrous metal. We can use that to defend against it. A quarter second blip of extreme magnetism may be able to repel the bullet (or, alternatively, attract it off course from the main body of the ship). You’ll EMP the shit out of anything on board, but eh, you can harden against that if you know it’s coming.

            Only other solution I can think of off hand is slagging the incoming round with laser fire but I have trouble believing you’d be able to detect, target, and vaporize an incoming railgun round in the amount of time you have between detection and impact. Those suckers move fast. Average result feels like it would be, congrats, you weren’t hit by a railgun round, but you have been hit by ten pounds of liquid metal moving at nearly relativistic speeds. Potato potato.

            Though, with the magnetic defense, the logical next step here is to develop a sort of ferrous sabot round that can accelerate the (non ferrous) payload and then release it to then completely not give any shits about further magnets. You pull that off and your opponent will have to rely on a laser intercept system or similar, and then - yeah, basically, whoever shoots first wins.

            There’s a lot to be said for good armor with good oblique angles though. Deflecting force is always going to be easier than absorbing it. If you can arrange to never give your enemy a good shot at a good flat plane, they’ll have a lot harder time penetrating your armor no matter how fast their shots are going. This won’t save you all the time but it’ll do a lot more than you’d probably expect.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        *If funded by the USA.

        The US took out a third of Iran’s navy during Operation Praying Mantis and we tried not to while giving them ample opportunity to not get fucking wrecked with minimal effort.

        We won’t fund healthcare, but our unhealthcare is second to nobody because we spend 9x more than the 2nd place loser, Russia. We account for 40% of total world military spending. If you think we can’t kill you, it is only because we don’t want to prove how wrong you are. If you want to die, we can put a warhead on your forehead without a rounding error of our defense budget.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone knows these lasers can’t hit anything on this flat earth. It needs to aim so far down the water will refract it unless you’re within like 20 feet.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you believe that the military is telepathically controlled by the head of the DOD and Hegseth, new to the position, was unable to manage his new psychic powers effectively enough to avoid the collision?

      If you knew anything about the military, you would know how it is a constant shit show of chaos that has a thin veneer of order.

      The military has dropped nukes on US soil by accident and just straight up lost them. One of them fell on a New Jersey farmer’s field and it buried itself into the ground so deep that they gave up looking for it. The government ended up buying the land and fencing it off. That wasn’t the only nuclear oopsie we had had.

      A few years ago the Navy lost a jet because a storm blew it off the deck because it was tied down with the wrong anchors.

      Friendly fire incidents, look at the War in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      If you Google non-combat military accidents, you will find pages of incidents.

      If you think the military is an efficient and well oiled machine, you need to stop watching the recruitment commercials or stop believing the lies the recruiter will tell you.

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What are you insinuating? It was perfectly justifiable to put our own soldiers right next to every single nuclear test we did, including flying aircraft and sailing ships through mushroom clouds, then withholding the soldiers’ medical records so they couldn’t prove radiation exposure and still to this day aren’t eligible for compensation.

    • DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I didn’t know anything about Hegseth, so I looked up his Wikipedia page to get an idea. While I did find extremely troubling concerns regarding his beliefs for a person in his position, I didn’t find anything that had to do with incompetence. He seems to be effective at whatever he does. He made Major, was awarded a Bronze Star, volunteered for deployment…all admirable achievements if they are valid (could have been invalidly attained). He might have a drinking problem, but I didn’t see any claims where he has jacked something up because of it. It said that he’ been drunk or hung over at Fox News, which is not strange for the military population since many like their drink. I’ve known heavy drinkers that get things done better than sober people, though their personal lives are a disaster. All that is to ask the honest question, why would Hegseth’s reputation, especially in the first month of a transition, imply some sort of mismanagement oh his part that lead to a terrible, highly unusual, and avoidable operational mishap?

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t know my ships, but please tell me that’s a destroyer to complete the scene perfectly.

  • nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    I just want nuclear pumped laser missiles, god, is it too much to ask?