For Curtis Sparrer, a work-from-home evangelist, an office is nothing less than a “corporate jail.”
Five years after the Covid-19 pandemic sent workers scrambling for home, laptops under their arm, Sparrer methodically challenges the arguments made by corporate America as it pushes for a full-time return to office.
The issue has even become increasingly political.
The incoming Trump administration, through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, plans to eliminate all remote work for federal employees.
“When you have a physical office, there is an implicit lack of trust. You need to see people there physically to make sure they’re doing their work,” the PR boss told AFP from his San Francisco apartment, overlooking the city’s iconic rooftops.
In the wake of the work-from-home revolution, hybrid work became the norm in the United States, with few exceptions such as Goldman Sachs and Tesla, which quickly mandated full-time office attendance.
Now, several major companies are abandoning the compromise approach.
Amazon recently required engineers and administrative staff to return five days a week. According to a survey conducted by the Blind professional social network last September, more than 90 percent of employees are unhappy with this decision.
Some speculate it’s a veiled downsizing strategy, though they believe the company founded by Jeff Bezos risks losing its top talent.
JPMorgan Chase’s March announcement ending telework met similar resistance.
Employees posted so many comments about concerns — from commuting costs to child care — on an internal platform that the bank shut down that section, according to The Wall Street Journal.
JPMorgan CFO Jeremy Barnum addressed the issue during a press call, and acknowledged the risk of losing valuable employees, saying: “We are very much not hoping for attrition as a function of return to office.”
“I’m disappointed that Amazon and others dragged people back to the office when we’ve been making so much progress in making work-from-home a national norm,” Sparrer laments. When founding Bospar in January 2015, Sparrer deliberately chose not to rent office space, both to save money and to recruit talent beyond San Francisco and New York. Ten years later, he stands by that decision.
Office environments inherently create inequality, he said.
“Someone gets the corner office with windows while another gets a cubicle, creating friction,” he explained.
“There’s also a higher likelihood of sexual harassment, illness spreading, and daily annoyances from office gossip to hearing colleagues chew their food.”
Sparrer particularly emphasized telecommuting’s environmental benefits, noting that most Americans drive to work in gas-guzzling cars.
“The typical office building is a polluting nightmare,” he said. His company’s research suggests that remote workers are more likely to cook at home instead of ordering delivery and to recycle their waste.
According to the “Flex Index” study by IT solutions company Scoop, by the end of 2024, about one-third of US companies required full-time office presence, 38 percent maintained a hybrid approach, and less than 30 percent offered complete employee choice.
Health care software provider DrFirst exemplifies the successful transition to remote work.
The company, which previously maintained three offices in Arizona and Maryland, shifted its 400 employees to permanent telework in 2023 based on employee feedback.
“Over 85 percent of our people reported that working remotely improved their overall well-being, whether mental or physical health, and reduced stress,” said Mathew Carrico, the company’s vice president of human resources.
“Productivity remained high.”
To maintain company culture, DrFirst established online social groups, regular check-ins, and a performance system based on quarterly objectives.
“We don’t dictate when, where, or how people work – that’s where trust comes in,” Carrico explained. “But we maintain accountability through results, just as we would in an office.”
Heather Happe, a 14-year DrFirst veteran, appreciates escaping rush-hour traffic.
“There’s that slippery slope of knowing when to stop working, but you learn to set boundaries,” she said.
“I can spend more time with my son, pets, and plants!”
Return to office mandates are some combination of management failure, class warfare, and maybe some real estate valuation nonsense. There’s no good reason for it.
I’d really like people to unionize so they can say “no” as a unified group.
During the pandemic, my career blossomed. I hit every metric and missed zero deadlines (that was within my control). I got promoted quickly and started leading a team.
Then a company bought us and after implementing a RTO, It was 3 times a week. My productivity dropped. I couldn’t concentrate when I was in the office with everyone’s conversation taking more than 1/2 my concentration.
At the end before I left, I was PIPed for poor performance and my manager tried his best to let me do full time remote.
At the end, I left on my own and found a position with lower pay but fully remote.
a work-from-home evangelist
I really thought he was a evangelical Christian, but like one who works from home 😅
Same. Thank you: I still feel dumb, but not as alone.
❤️
We can be dumb together~ lol
“When you have a physical office, there is an implicit lack of trust. You need to see people there physically to make sure they’re doing their work,” the PR boss told AFP from his San Francisco apartment, overlooking the city’s iconic rooftops.
Sorry, I can’t take you seriously when you’re saying people can’t be trusted working from home…when you’re taking an interview from your apartment. Don’t you have an office? Ipso facto, there’s an implicit lack of trust.
“Do as I say, not as I do” is a terrible trait for a supposed leader, and everyone knows it.
I think you misunderstood them…
Said another way:
“There’s an unspoken lack of trust that comes with forcing people to come (back) into an office. Basically, it’s the employer telling their employees that they don’t trust them to do their work unless management can physically see them at their desks in the office.”
My old office was 90s as hell with big beige cubicles and ceiling tiles. My desk was outside of my boss’s office. It was 35 minutes away and I went in almost every day even though WFH was an option
Then we moved to a fancy new open office with half height glass walls. It’s 10 minutes away and they’re lucky if they see me twice a week now.
I don’t want to hear every conversation in the office. I work better, faster, and with fewer breaks when it’s quiet. I have to use push-to-talk in meetings.
Clearly it worked well for Tesla so we should do it on a federal level
Interesting that the rest of the developed world is fine with it. At least based on that title.
That’s not what the title implies. I think your logic is lacking
I’m very sorry for your loss of imagination.
It’s not lack of imagination. Your made an inflamating statement for no reason. I love a good US bashing, but the title is just focusing on the US and that’s that. I’m sorry for your poor reading comprehension.
Again, I’m sorry for your lack of imagination and child-like need to lash out. Therapy might help you.
No one’s lashing out here. It seems like you have a tendency to perceive unmeasured emotions and wrong intentions to what you read, that the writer didn’t intent (which is not uncommon online ofc). That’s usually projection. There’s nothing to gain from assuming the worst intentions of people on a randon site that can’t hurt you. Even the suggestion of therapy sounds like projection. And to be clear, I’m not trying to be offensive here. It’s just such a weird reaction to my reply.
Either that or you’re just purposely trolling.
I’m