• puppy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            98
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Contender? He should’ve been the president in 2016. Democrats had to fuck that up. Trump won mostly because people hated Hilary.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              42
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              4 months ago

              Hilary won the popular vote by almost 3 million because most people liked her.

              She lost the electoral college vote because of a few really close states.

              • puppy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                47
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, against a playboy who didn’t have any political experience or acumen whatsoever. This should’ve been a landslide victory for dems. I stand by what I said, Trump won because it was Hilary he was up against. If it were Bernie, Trump wouldn’t have had a chance.

                • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  29
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Even my dad, a blue collar welder in his late 60s, was totally on the Bernie train in 2016. If that doesn’t tell you anything about how Bernie could have done, I don’t know what will.

              • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                A few states that were really close because her campaign was up against a social-media heavy campaign that weaponized misinformation, and didn’t know how to respond.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                4 months ago

                She lost the electoral college because she rigged the primary.

                In retrospect the margin was so thin that if she’d only modestly pissed off Sanders voters she would have won.

              • bunkyprewster@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m not so sure of that. Rich people from both parties might have thrown their money and power against the threat of even weak tea socialism.

            • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Hilary was beating the rapist with 34 felonies ass in the polls. The shit stain won because people thought it was a landslide and didn’t need to vote. That won’t happen again. She still won popular vote, something a republikkklown hasn’t done in a hot minute.

              • Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Trump was an “unknown” in 2016… he has since made his stance painfully obvious. I think a lot more people are going to be willing to pinch their nose and vote for VP Harris.

                At least I hope so…

            • Xanis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Nah, Hilary was a fine choice despite her own personal and political issues. Despite not preferring her, I am rather confident that she would have not made a bad President. Perhaps not a good one, just also not a bad one.

              Fucking shame what happened. Oi, Chaps! I say we bloody up this wanker with a side o’ voting!

              Sorry, channeling my stereotypical inner mocking British man.

              Edit: I stand by what I said unless given compelling reasons to not do so. Maybe I’m remembering things incorrectly. It’s been awhile. Make a case, don’t care if it’s a legitimate link. I’m happy to do a learn.

            • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              4 months ago

              He wasn’t a Democratic Party member in 2016. He caucused and partnership with them but if he’s not going to be in the party, nobody should be surprised that he’s not the parties pick or preference. He didn’t officially join them until 2019. The circumstances might not have worked but be real the Democrats didn’t fuck it up in 2016.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            4 months ago

            Unfortunately Bernie’s leftist policies posed a slight risk to a small percentage of capital. So an all-out bipartisan effort to torpedo him ensued, and from the ashes emerged Planet Hillary.

          • qprimed@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think Bernie is a pretty smart guy. he knows where he can be most effective - no trajectory change needed.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think everyone who had their name pushed and could have a chance at the convention has already endorsed Kamala Harris. They’re pretty obviously trying to avoid a contentious convention.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          That seems to be the goal. I think it’s a good idea to not go too hard on Harris until the convention, but the excitement seems there.

      • The25002@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah it’s a point they’re allowed to make now, don’t know how well it’s really going to stick though. However so far the best republicans have against Kamala is that she… Laughs? That’s a good sign. Like a lot of the stuff people like me on the left have against Kamala is stuff republicans wouldn’t want to at her for.

      • Codex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I still really want AOC but with Whitmer bowing out I think Buttigiege is probably it.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Harris is a black woman. No way they’re picking a gay man as her running mate. They’re worried she has too much for the (X)phobic crowd on her own. I would be absolutely shocked if whoever they pick as her VP isn’t a straight white man. You can say what you like about it but that’s the reality of where we are as a nation.

          • Bizzle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            The kind of people who would not vote for Harris because she’s a Black woman were already going to vote for Trump.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              There are absolutely people who are not concerned enough with race or gender to vote for a black woman but are still homophobic. Who knows how many people that is but I would bet a lot of money that the DNC has no intention of finding out.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yet dropping out didn’t make him a single day younger. He’s still too old.

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          How would you know??? I bet it did!

          COVID, my ass, Biden been drinking from the fountain of youth. Any day now, he’ll become unborn and lay in stasis until ready to be birthed for his next presidential run in 2077 during which he’ll battle Mecha-Reagan!

          If you don’t believe me, ask my neighbor’s dog. They’re the one who told me all this. Crafty damn dog…

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    He is too old, but like, if a 90 year old hitler were running for president i wouldnt be saying im not voting for him because of his age. Trump has been the worst parts of humanity for decades.

  • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dementia Don, the racist rapist with 34 felonies that can’t complete a coherent sentence is too old. He needs to drop out, it’s just embarrassing at this point.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    4 months ago

    He confused Biden and Obama, Haley and Pelosi. Bizarre stuff spews from his mouth nearly every time he opens it. Where’s the outrage?

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This really demonstrates a difference between democrats and republicans.

    Democrats cared about the hypocrisy of pointing out that the opponent candidate was too old, and only started saying this after this was no longer a problem.

    Republicans didn’t care that their candidate was also too old.

  • troglodytis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wait wait, the Democrats, who said Biden was too old and stopped giving $ to Biden’s campaign are being consistent in their message? Well I’ll be damned.

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe, but that’s because the rest of us did think he was to old. One doesn’t invalidate the other.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The people who pulled the money felt he was likely to fail because of his age, or rather, the affects of it on his performance. If he had been killing it, he would still be in. However they didn’t pull their money because of him arming a genocidal regime, which is the issue that the comment I was replying to, was saying.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jesus Fred Christ what are the photo editors doing?

    Every trump article has an ever-more-close-up even-greasier horror picture of his sociopathic rapist fraud face. Man, nobody wants to see that shit!

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    if you aint fit for working after 65+, you shouldnt be fit to be a fucking president

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is there a nursing home prison? Because Trump belongs in prison, and maybe his age and poor health will save some taxpayer money.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Specifically, their own homes. Both are rich enough to afford private duty nursing.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re being weirdly pedantic. Biden is still just as old as he was, so he’s still too old to run. If some other octogenarian stepped up and said he’d like to run I would say he’s too old too.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        (is there some sort of bot swarm happening here)

        Welcome to Lemmy politics 🙂

        I won’t say bots specifically. But yes, there is a PALPABLE tide of accounts that are just going to muster the least-bullshit reason they can find to oppose the idea of the Democrats being good or worth voting for, and repeat it relentlessly, even if the least-bullshit they can come up with doesn’t even approximate making sense. And they never shut up. They’re just sort of stuck on Biden right now because the new Harris talking points aren’t fully marshaled yet.

        Have fun! Try to enjoy it. I like using them to tee up extensive explanations of what is good and right in politics, that would be weird and partisan if I just showed up and started announcing them.

        HEY DID YOU KNOW BIDEN SPENT HALF A TRILLION OF AMAZON.COM’S DOLLARS ON FIGHTING CLIMATE CHANGE? That’s almost ten times what any other US politician has ever done, and that was back in 2009

        See it’s weird if it just comes out of nowhere

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Someone can still be old even if they aren’t running for president. Nothing in the statement implies or relies on biden still running for president, just that he is old. He still is. It’s ok to still think about people even when they aren’t in the news anymore, they didn’t go away.

    • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      True. Still hypocritical as fuck to not say anything about the age while they had someone running for president who was even older.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        It was just the Republicans who had a problem with it. Seemed like Biden was doing fine, so why complain? Haven’t you heard of this concept of giving someone a “taste of their own medicine?”

        200% justified lol

  • Kabloink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    Makes sense, If 81 is too old, 78 is probably too old too. After all, Trump would be 81 during his presidency if he wins.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Is that from old age or years of hard drug abuse? You may be off topic with your diaper fact… which is crazy to think about since he has been a serious contender in three presidential elections. 🤦‍♀️

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are multiple pictures of Turd sitting down where it’s painfully obvious he is wearing a diaper.

        Normally there is nothing wrong with that, but he, and everyone who votes R, is a piece of shit and was mocking Biden for his age with diapers. Have never seen a photo of Biden like that.

        Also, it was one of those unconfirmed by everyone in the White House and who works with Turd that he shits himself constantly.

    • StaySquared@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I love how you try to revise history when it was Biden, caught on camera, during a ceremony in France, who apparently shat his pants.

      LOL fkin revisionists are amazing. I swear.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        No one said Biden didn’t have continence issues. They are saying it is obvious Trump has to wear adult diapers when he sits down, thus he is likely needing them regularly. You are so primed to either suck-off trump, or shit on biden, or both, that your reading comprehension just gets by-passed by the hair-trigger response.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      And not just normal age related broken. Though age hasn’t really improved the situation.

    • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      His brain is even more broken than before. Watch the footage of MAGAts walking out of his rallies as he keeps repeating the same things and talking gibberish.