• However, some US politicians are busy taking the case personally, believing the patrol is targeting the US.

    Well that’s a silly point, this definitely was targeting the US, it’s just a valid and necessary target and actually followed the law unlike the US does.

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The author of this seems to have had a stroke while writing it, the English is incredibly broken. I think they’re taking issue with the statements of a private citizen who in no way, shape, or form represents the USA.

    • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The English is fine.

      They are taking issue with the double standard the US has presented, both through its actions and official statements. The article quotes statements from a currently sitting Senator, and a member of a US Government adjacent think tank who was a ranking military officer. These are definitely not the private opinions of private citizens.